Nevertheless, most particle doses were outright cytotoxic after 24 h exposure of the cells (Fig. 4B). The PM2.5 material VERP, and the EHC-93sol fraction, were not cytotoxic by XTT reduction assay at any dose tested after 2, 3, and 7 h exposure, and remained marginally
cytotoxic click here after 24 h exposure (i.e. >80% viability). Respiratory burst effects (induction or inhibition) of particles as well as their effects on cytotoxicity were summarized as relative potencies (β, Table 2). The potency of the particles for respiratory burst (βi) was not correlated (r = 0.101, p = 0.756, Pearson correlation) to cytotoxic potency at 2 h after particle exposure (βv2). Nevertheless, it is conceivable that for particles with high cytotoxicity (e.g. SRM-1648, copper II oxide), the measurements of respiratory bursts would be biased by the low cell viability. Therefore, an unbiased potency estimate (βi-v2 = βi − βv2) was calculated. Most of the inhibitory effect of copper II oxide on the measured Apitolisib ic50 respiratory burst appeared to be explained by the low cell viability (βi-v2 ≈ 0). In contrast, the inhibitory effects of iron III oxide and iron II/III oxide were not explained by a decrease of cell viability (βi-v2 ≈ −0.16 and ≈−0.06, respectively).
The viability of the cells at 2, 3, 7 and 24 h was highly correlated across
the different particle preparations (r > 0.9, p < 0.0002, Pearson) (data not shown). While the stimulants by themselves caused an induction of respiratory burst that was several fold higher isometheptene than that resulting from the macrophage response to particles (Fig. 2), exposure of the cells to particles prior to stimulation effectively abrogated the stimulant-induced respiratory burst (Fig. 5). The inhibition of the stimulant-induced respiratory burst was seen across all the stimulants tested for most particle doses. This was particularly evident in cells induced by Zymosan (Fig. 5B). Exceptions to this general inhibition response included PMA stimulation in cells exposed to EHC-93sol, TiO2, or SiO2 ( Fig 5A) and a number of particles where the lowest dose did not produce reductions in respiratory burst, such as EHC-93tot, EHC-93insol in PMA-treated cells ( Fig 5A) and EHC-93tot and TiO2 in LPS/IFN-γ-treated cells ( Fig. 5C). In fact, SiO2 was particularly potent in enhancing PMA- ( Fig 5A) and LPS/IFN-γ- ( Fig 5C) induced effects at all doses tested (dose within particle, p < 0.05) while TiO2 and EHC-93sol showed increases at some doses (dose within particle, p < 0.05), but the effects were marginal once adjusted for cell viability ( Table 3) (TiO2, βi-v2 = −0.007 and EHC-93sol, βi-v2 = 0.024).