The vaccine is also available at the private health system. This strategy results in very low vaccine coverage: <1% of children aged 1–4 years received the vaccine in 2009. According to WHO criteria, the country should selleck chemical consider the introduction of universal vaccination against hepatitis A [1]. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of a universal childhood hepatitis A vaccination program

in Brazil. Since hepatitis A seroprevalence, disease treatment costs and indirect costs differ throughout the country, cost-effectiveness of vaccination may also differ. So, the analysis was run separately according to the regional endemic context. Two strategies were compared: universal childhood hepatitis A vaccination program in the second year of life and the current strategy (vaccination of high risk persons). An age and time-dependent susceptible – infected/infectious – recovered – vaccinated EGFR inhibitor (SIRV) compartmental

dynamic model of hepatitis A transmission was developed to estimate the incidence of the disease for a period of 30 years (Appendix A) [10] and [11]. The model was based on data from a nationwide population survey of seroprevalence of hepatitis, conducted from 2004 to 2009, which involved persons aged 5–69 years, in the 27 Brazilian state capitals. It showed an area of intermediate endemicity of hepatitis A – the North, Northeast, and Midwest regions, where 32.8%, 52.9% and 63.2% of children and adolescents aged 5–9, 10–14 and 15–19 years had anti-hepatitis A antibodies, and an area of low endemicity – the South and Southeast regions, where 19.8%, 30.3% and 43.7% of children and adolescents of the same age had anti-hepatitis A antibodies [7], [8] and [9]. The model incorporated a variable force of Calpain infection accounting for herd effects of a universal immunization program. Demographic data were

obtained from Brazilian National Institute of Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, IBGE) [12]. The dynamic model predicted the numbers of hepatitis A infections by age and year for the whole Brazilian population, with the current strategy and the impact of a universal childhood immunization program. The analysis was run separately combining the North, Northeast and Midwest macro-regions, from now on called “North” area, and for the South and Southeast, from now on called “South” area. A decision analysis model built in Microsoft Excel was used to estimate health services utilization and costs associated to hepatitis A by age group and region of residence. The analysis was conducted using the health system perspective, including all direct medical costs (medical visits, diagnostics tests, medications and hospitalizations), and the societal perspective, incorporating nonmedical and productivity costs.