The news section of the website also seemed to be under development. It encouraged the user to ‘read our press releases’ but did not list any. The site has

a clear help section and detailed information about the people behind the website. There is a list of funders and a link to the funding policy which states that money will not be accepted from pharmaceutical companies or any for-profit organisation with vested interested in the research findings. In summary, this is a very useful website and I encourage readers to visit it and to consider recommending it to colleagues, students, and computer-literate patients. “
“The IPQ-R is an 84-item self-completed instrument developed to provide a quantitative measurement of the components of illness representations, as described by Leventhal’s Common-Sense Model (CSM) of selfregulation OSI906 (Leventhal et al 1984, 1997). It is divided into three sections: identity

subscale (14 symptoms), causal subscale (18 causes), and a third section which contains 7 subscales, including consequences, timeline acute/chronic and cyclical, personal and Selleck Screening Library treatment control/cure, illness coherence, and emotional representations. Researchers are encouraged to adapt the questionnaire wording to the specific illness under investigation by replacing the word illness with the name of the condition under investigation. Instructions to clients and scoring: For the identity subscale, respondents are asked if they have experienced a number of symptoms since their illness, and if they feel the symptoms are related to their current illness. Response is by circling ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to each question. Responses are then summed to give an overall score. For the causal subscale, respondents are asked what they perceive to be the cause of their illness and are asked to respond to each of the listed causes using a 5-point Likert style scale, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Respondents TCL are also asked to rank the

3 most important factors believed to be the cause of their illness. The third section (7 subscales) is scored by summing responses to each item is on a 5-point Likert style scale, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. All items for each of the subscales are summed to give an overall score. High scores on the identity, consequences, timeline acute/chronic and cyclical subscales represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed, the negative consequences, and the chronicity and cyclical nature of the illness. High scores on the personal and treatment control and coherence subscales represent positive beliefs about controllability and a personal understanding of the illness. For non-English speaking patients the questionnaire has been translated into a number of languages, including Norwegian, French, and Dutch.