05) from pre-

to post-test responses from NAP SACC for all centers and with centers separated by affiliation with school district. All 33 child care centers were eligible to participate in this project. However, 29 centers returned complete data on NAP SACC and had 100% attendance at all workshops; one center changed ownership, one center closed, and two centers had incomplete post-test evaluations. These four centers were all categorized as unaffiliated with school districts. Basic demographics about the residents of the counties where the child care centers Abiraterone ic50 were located are presented in Table 1. A large proportion of the residents in these counties were below the average poverty level for the ABT-737 price state of North Carolina, based on census data. More than 85% of the population was white, non-Hispanic (United States Census Bureau). Table 2 and Table 3 list the categories, questions and responses to the nutrition and physical activity questions, respectively, before and after the intervention. Data are reported as averages for all centers in Table 2 and Table 3 and for affiliated and unaffiliated with

school districts in Table 4 and Table 5. At baseline, only one out of 37 nutrition responses were below standard (or 1 on the 1–4 Likert scale), ‘meals served family style;’ while 17 out of 37 were exceeding standards (3 or above on the scale). Additionally, five nutrition standards significantly improved after the intervention period. More specifically, offerings of ‘100% juice during the day’ and ‘visibly showing nutrition in the classrooms and common areas’ shifted from meeting standards (2 on a 1–4 Likert scale) to far exceeding standards (3 on a 1–4 Likert scale) while ‘weekly menus including both new and familiar foods’ significantly improved, these it was still rated at meeting standards. For two of the three items in ‘nutrition education for staff, children, and parents’ centers improved from meeting to exceeding standards. After the intervention, centers still “rarely or never” (1 on a 1–4 Likert scale)

served meals family style. Similar findings were seen in the physical activity responses. For baseline measures, only ‘physical activity education is offered to parents’ was rated below standard, and nine out of 17 responses were rated as exceeding or far exceeding standards (or 2 or 3 on the 1–4 Likert scale). In four of the five items listed in “play environment”, centers significantly improved by making more fixed and portable play equipment available as well as providing adequate space for physical activity. In addition, ‘visibly displaying physical activity in the classrooms and common areas’ and ‘training opportunities are provided for staff’ and ‘physical activity education is offered to parents’ improved to far exceeding standards. The 29 centers were further separated by whether they were affiliated with the school district (N = 14) or not (N = 15).