The study of invasive Hib disease conducted in Colombo district with financial assistance from the Hib Initiative LY2835219 datasheet provided critical support to the ACCD in its decision to recommend the introduction of Hib vaccine into the NPI in 2008. The Committee also commissioned the Epidemiology Unit to conduct local disease burden studies of human papillomavirus (HPV) (with financial support from UNFPA), invasive pneumococcal disease (with support from GAVI’s PneumoADIP), and rotavirus (with support from the International Vaccine

Institute (IVI)), to inform decisions about the introduction of these vaccines in the future. Data on appropriate vaccines, their immunogenicity, efficacy and safety profiles are also required by the ACCD before recommending the introduction of a new vaccine. As a government policy, the ACCD will approve only WHO pre-qualified vaccines for use in the NPI. As such, they demand methodologically sound, credible

vaccine efficacy and safety data from other countries, and it is the duty of the epidemiologists as managers of the NPI to provide the Committee with this information. In addition, in recent years, the ACCD has required that safety and immunogenicity studies for some new vaccines be conducted in the Sri Lankan population before a recommendation for their introduction BGB324 can be made. Before the Committee would make a decision to replace the inactivated mouse-brain JE vaccine with the live, low cost SA 14-14-2 vaccine from China, it recommended that a study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine be carried out among Sri Lankan

children. While the ACCD realizes that conducting local studies delays the introduction of a new vaccine and incurs additional costs, it felt compelled to recommend this study because of scepticism in the medical community about existing data on the safety and immunogenicity of the live JE vaccine. The Committee recommended the switch to the live vaccine found in 2009 based on the positive results of the local study. Since the NPI is mainly a self-funded program with many competing priorities, its managers have started to look at results of economic analyses of new vaccines before making decisions about their introduction, with the support of external economists (e.g., from universities). A cost-effectiveness study was conducted before introducing the live JE vaccine, and a similar study is underway for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, while another has been planned for rotavirus vaccine.