The 1H-indazole was found to be the dominant tautomer in the gaseous state and in aqueous solution, and this result is not reversed in the excited state by a solvent effect [1] and [7]. X-ray diffraction studies of N-unsubstituted indazoles confirm the general preference for 1H-tautomers in the solid state [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29] and [30]. 1H-Indazoles have benzenoid properties (are aromatic in nature), while 2-substituted 2H-indazoles have ortho-quinoid character [31] and [32]. 3H-Indazoles lack

heteroaromatic character and are very rare [33]. There is some evidence regarding the influence of the tautomeric equilibrium in indazoles on the different biological properties [34], [35], [36], [37] and [38]. However, the effect of tautomer identity on the antiproliferative activity, biological mechanisms involved, and other physico-chemical properties, which can have an impact on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviors Selleck KU-57788 in the case of metal complexes with indazole remains unexplored. Herein we report on the one-pot synthesis of two complexes, (H2ind)[OsIVCl5(2H-ind)] (1) and (H2ind)[OsIVCl5(1H-ind)] [39] (2). Stabilization of the

2H-form of Vorinostat purchase indazole and binding to osmium(IV) via nitrogen atom N1 was found in 1. This is only the second example of indazole coordination via N1 to a transition metal ion [40]. In addition, we studied the stability of both isomers in aqueous solution and compared their antiproliferative activity in vitro in three human cancer cell lines CH1 (ovarian carcinoma), SW480 (colon carcinoma) and A549 (non-small Ureohydrolase cell lung cancer) and in vivo in a Hep3B SCID mouse xeno-transplantation model in order to establish whether tautomer identity in 1 and 2 has any effect on biological properties.

The antiproliferative activity of (H2ind)[OsIVCl5(2H-ind)] (1) was found to be superior to that of (H2ind)[OsIVCl5(1H-ind)] (2) in one of three human cancer cell lines applied but inferior in the in vivo xeno-transplantation model. The starting compounds [(DMSO)2H]2[OsCl6] [41] and [42] and (H2ind)2[OsCl6] [43] were synthesized as previously reported in the literature. OsO4 (99.8%) and N2H4·2HCl were purchased from Johnson Matthey and Fluka, correspondingly, while 1H-indazole was from Aldrich. All these chemicals were used without further purification. (H2ind)[OsCl5(2H-Hind)] (1) and (H2ind)[OsCl5(1H-Hind)] (2) were prepared under argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques ( Chart 2). A suspension of (H2ind)2[OsCl6] (100 mg, 0.16 mmol) in ethanol (2 ml) was heated in a Schlenk tube at 100 °C (oil bath) for 2 h. After cooling to room temperature the violet precipitate of 1 was filtered off, recrystallized from water/acetone (1:1), and dried in vacuo. Yield of 1: 27 mg, 27%. By reducing the volume of the filtrate to one half a brown solid of 2 was formed. This was filtered off, washed with cold ethanol (2 ml) and dried in vacuo.