Technical experts were invited by WHO/CAH to systematically list

Technical experts were invited by WHO/CAH to systematically list and then use standard methods to score research questions according to their likelihood to (i) be answered in all ethical way, (ii) lead to (Or improve) effective interventions, (iii) be deliverable, affordable, and sustainable, (iv) maximize death burden reduction, and (v) have an equitable

effect in the population. The scores were then weighted according to the values provided by a wide group of stakeholders from the global research priority-setting network.

Findings: On a 100-point scale, the final priority scores for 69 research questions ranged from 39 MK 2206 to 83. Most of the 15 research questions Screening Library mw that received the highest scores were in the domain of health systems and policy research to address barriers affecting existing cost-effective interventions. The priority questions focused oil promotion of home care practices to prevent newborn infections and approaches to increase coverage and quality of management of newborn infections in health facilities as well as in the community. While community-based intervention research is receiving

some current investment, rigorous evaluation and cost analysis is almost entirely lacking for research on facility-based interventions and quality improvement.

Interpretation: Given the lack of progress in improving newborn survival despite the existence of effective interventions, it is not surprising that of the top ranked research priorities in this article the majority are in the domain of health systems

and policy research. We urge funding agencies and investigators to invest in these research priorities to accelerate reduction of neonatal deaths, particularly those due to infections.”
“Purpose learn more To provide evidence for the validity of the Fragebogen zur Lebensqualitat multimorbider alterer Menschen (FLQM; English: Quality of life in elders with multimorbidity), a new tool for the assessment of life-satisfaction as a subjective indicator of quality of life in old age.

Methods The FLQM measures overall life-satisfaction based on those self-generated domains in life that are most important to the respondent. Construct validity (correlations with convergent and divergent scales) and differential validity (subgroup differences with respect to age and limitations in everyday functioning) were analyzed in an urban sample of older adults (n = 299; 54.6% male; Mean (age) = 75.65 years, SD = 6.57).

Results Correlations of FLQM with measures of similar constructs were close (r = 0.35-0.50; p < 0.001). There were no age-group differences. However, subjects with self-reported impairment in functioning scored significantly lower on the FLQM. Also, the relationship between FLQM and self-rated health was close (r = 0.44; p < 0.001).

Comments are closed.