“
“It is widely accepted that, in many cases, the heavy metals wrapped in complex sulphide ores are difficult, not-environment-friendly and costly to be leached with conventional mineral processing methods [1]. With the depletion of the easy-to-process ores, the energy costs and the growing movement toward sustainable Hormones antagonist mining are increasing. The practices of biohydrometallurgy

are gradually accepted in the commercial applications. The low production costs and relatively small environmental pollution that makes biohydrometallurgy been efficiently used to process low-grade copper minerals and refractory ores [2], [3] and [4]. The technology and technique of the bioleaching, oxidation and complexation processes, which are supported and promoted by the developments in the fields of hydrometallurgy, geology, microbiology, chemical analysis, mineralogy, surface science and molecular biology. These have been applied and employed widely for the recovery of the heavy metals from sulfuric minerals and ores, such as copper,

nickel, zinc, cobalt and uranium [4], [5], [6] and [7]. Operation and applications of biohydrometallurgy in industries are artificially divided into two terms, bioleaching and biooxidation. The first term is related to the solubilization of base metals such as copper, nickel, and zinc from the ores, whereas biooxidation is used for the bioleached solubilized metals which are wrapped, or locked, in sulfide minerals, in most cases, iron and arsenic, and some precious metal,

typically gold and silver [8]. Recently, the advantages and Small molecule library superiority in industrial processes through the usage and deployment of thermophiles, moderate thermophile and extreme thermophile have been demonstrated. It has effectively avoided the issues and problems that are quite common in processes using psychrophilic and mesophilic bacteria, such as cooling of PJ34 HCl leaching system, acid mine/rock drainage and some other environmental problems [9] and [10]. Accurately, there are two bioleaching modes, contact and non-contact leaching modes, which is now gradually accepted instead of the classified modes of direct mechanism and indirect mechanism [11] and [12]. The exist evidences of the direct enzymatic oxidation for the sulfur part of heavy metal sulfides cannot be demonstrated and testified. Non-contact leaching is basically exerted by planktonic bacteria, which oxidize ferrous ions in solution. While the contact leaching takes into account that most of ores dissolution is through the medium of the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in the specific microenvironment [13]. It should be clear that the analysis of bacterial–mineral interfaces at the molecular scale and potential mechanism of cell to cell communication systems are still unknown or fragmented [14] and [15].