Importantly, descending inputs from ventral striatum Dabrafenib order to VTA (Figure 1B; Lisman and Grace, 2005) could provide modulatory input related to the adaptive value of retrieved information for current goals, providing greater contextual specificity to re-encoding. Adaptive encoding can provide a reasonable account of a portion, though not all, of the evidence regarding striatal involvement at retrieval. Certainly, retrieval success and novelty effects in striatum,

as observed with fMRI, could reflect encoding modulation in accord with the current utility of an item. Indeed, even differences between source retrieval and item familiarity/general recollection could relate to the degree of match between retrieved information and a maintained goal. However, the evidence of retrieval deficits in patient groups with basal ganglia dysfunction (e.g., Cohn et al., 2010) argues that striatum also plays a role in retrieval itself, rather than exclusively influencing future retrieval attempts. With this in mind, we will now consider two hypotheses that propose a role for striatum in ongoing retrieval. Striatum

may modulate retrieval itself in accord with the expected utility of retrieval success in the current context. As noted above, if one takes the goal of memory retrieval to be recovering those items with high expected Fulvestrant utility given the context, then cognitive control of memory is a means by which the priority of items in Endonuclease memory can be modified on-line to increase the likelihood of retrieving relevant information and minimize the influence of irrelevant information. In its specifics, this objective can be reached by a number of means, and indeed, there are likely several control

mechanisms that operate complementarily at different stages of retrieval. For example, attention might be directed to cues in the environment that increase the likelihood of successful retrieval. Likewise, a cue might be maintained in working memory or semantically elaborated to allow it to influence retrieval. Following retrieval, monitoring of retrieved information and selection of information that matches decision criteria or behavioral goals can ensure accuracy and precision. Cognitive neuroscience research on the cognitive control of retrieval has provided a share of evidence regarding how PFC is organized to support these functions (e.g., Shimamura, 1995; Rugg et al., 2003; Dobbins and Wagner, 2005; Badre and Wagner, 2007; Öztekin and Badre, 2011; Gallo et al., 2010). Importantly, however, all of these cognitive control mechanisms share a common demand to maintain a goal or relevant contextual feature in working memory in order to provide a top-down bias on current processing (Desimone and Duncan, 1995; Miller and Cohen, 2001). PFC is widely thought to support this working memory maintenance function.