idtdna.com/scitools/Applications/RealTimePCR/). CquiOR1 forward and reverse; 5′-TCCGGAAAGGAAGATCATTG-3′ and 5′-CGTTACAAACTCGGGACGAT-3′; CquiOR44 forward and reverse; 5′-AGTGGCACAGTGAGATGCAG-3′ and 5′-CACCTCGAGCAGAAACATCA-3′; CquiOR73 forward and reverse; 5′-CTGGGTATGCTGAGGAACTTC-3′ and 5′-GCAGCCAGATCCAAAAGTTG-3′; CquiOR161 forward and reverse; 5′-GTCCAGAGCTGGATCCTCAG-3′ and 5′-AGCGAAAAGGCAAAGTTGAA-3′; CquiRpS7 forward and reverse; 5′-ATCCTGGAGCTGGAGATGA-3′

and 5′-GATGACGATGGCCTTCTTGT-3′. Reactions were run with the following standard program: 95 °C for 30 s, 39 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 55 °C for 10 s, 72 °C for 30 s, melt curve of 65 to 95 °C, increment 0.5 °C, 5 s. Data were analyzed using Rapamycin mw the 2−ΔΔCT method using Bio-Rad CFX Manager 2.1 software. In vitro transcription of cRNAs was performed by using a mMESSAGE mMACHINE

T7 kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, plasmids were linearized with NheI or SphI, and capped cRNAs were transcribed using T7 RNA polymerase. The cRNAs were purified with LiCl precipitation solution and re-suspended in nuclease-free water at a concentration of 200 μg/ml and stored at −80 °C in aliquots. RNA concentrations were determined by UV spectrophotometry. cRNA were microinjected (2 ng of CquiORX cRNA and 2 ng of CquiOrco cRNA) into stage V or VI Xenopuslaevis oocytes (EcoCyte Bioscience, Austin TX). The GDC-0199 molecular weight oocytes were then incubated at 18 °C for 3–7 days in modified Barth’s solution [in mM: 88 NaCl, 1 KCl, 2.4 NaHCO3, 0.82 MgSO4, 0.33 Ca(NO3)2, 0.41 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4] supplemented with 10 μg/ml of gentamycin, 10 μg/ml of streptomycin and 1.8 mM sodium pyruvate. The two-electrode voltage clamp (TEVC) was employed to detect inward currents. Oocytes were placed in perfusion chamber and challenged with a panel of 90 compounds in a random order (flow rate was 10 ml/min). Chemical-induced currents were amplified with an OC-725C

amplifier check details (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT), voltage held at −70 mV, low-pass filtered at 50 Hz and digitized at 1 kHz. Data acquisition and analysis were carried out with Digidata 1440A and software pCLAMP 10 (Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA). Oocytes expressing test ORs were challenged with a panel of 90 compounds, including known mosquito oviposition attractants, plant and vertebrate host kairomones, and natural repellents: 1-hexanol, 1-octanol, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol, (Z)-2-hexen-1-ol, 1-hexen-3-ol, 1-heptene-3-ol, 3-octanol, 1-octen-3-ol ( Kline et al., 1990), 3-octyn-1-ol, 1-octyn-3-ol, 1-nonanol, 1-hexadecanol, 2-phenoxyethanol, 2,3-butanediol, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, butyl acetate, pentyl acetate, hexyl acetate, octyl acetate, decyl acetate, (E)-2-hexenyl acetate, (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, ethyl lactate, methyl propionate, ethyl propionate, methyl butyrate, ethyl 3-hydroxyhexanoate, methyl salicylate, 2-heptanone, 2-nonanone, 2-undecanone, cyclohexanone, acetophenone, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one ( Birkett et al., 2004, Logan et al., 2009 and Logan et al.