Am J Surg 1999, 178:177–9.CrossRefPubMed 10. Abu-Zidan FM: The international conference on problem based learning
in higher education. Med Educ 1997, 31:390–3.CrossRefPubMed 11. Abu-Zidan FM, Windsor JA: Students’ evaluation of surgical seminars in a teaching hospital. Med Educ 2001, 35:673–80.CrossRefPubMed 12. Abu-Zidan FM, Premadasa IG: Instructional skills of surgical tutors. Singapore Med J 2002, 43:610–3.PubMed 13. Chapman DM, Char DM, Aubin CD: Clinical decision making. In Rosen’s Emergency Medicine concepts and clinical RG7112 chemical structure practice.. 6th edition. Edited by: Marx JA, Hockberger RS, Walls RM. Mosby Elsevier, PA; 2006:125–133. Rosen’s Emergency Medicine concepts and clinical practice 14. Eva KW: What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2005, 39:98–106.CrossRefPubMed 15. Bowen JL: Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 2006, 355:2217–25.CrossRefPubMed 16. Ochsendorf FR, Boehncke WH, Sommerlad M, Kaufmann R: Interactive large-group teaching in a dermatology course. Med Teach 2006, 28:697–701.CrossRefPubMed 17. Fyrenius A, Bergdal B, Silen C: Lectures in problem-based
learning – why, when and how? An example of interactive lecturing that stimulates meaningful learning. Med Teach 2005, 27:61–65.CrossRefPubMed 18. Woolf N, Quinn J: Learners’ perceptions of instructional design practice in a situated learning SCH727965 chemical structure activity. Education Tech Research Dev 2009, 57:25–43.CrossRef 19. Das M, El-Sabban F, Bener A: Student and faculty perceptions of the characteristics of an ideal teacher in a classroom setting. Med Teach 1999, 18:141–146.CrossRef 20. Ernst H, Colthorpe K: The efficacy of interactive lecturing for students with diverse Sitaxentan science backgrounds. Adv Physiol Educ 2007, 31:41–44.CrossRefPubMed 21. Nasmith L, Steinert Y: The evaluation of a workshop to promote interactive lecturing. Teach Learn Med 2001, 13:43–48.CrossRefPubMed 22. Wilkerson L: Identification of skills for the problem-based tutor: student and faculty
perspectives. Instructional Science 1995, 22:303–315.CrossRef 23. Sachdeva AK: Use of effective questioning to enhance the cognitive abilities of students. J Cancer Educ 1996, 11:17–24.PubMed 24. Tabak I: Reconstructing context: negotiating the tension between exogenous and endogenous educational design. Educ Psychol 2004, 39:225–233.CrossRef 25. Pratt DD, Harris P, Collins JB: The power of one: looking beyond the teacher in clinical instruction. Med Teach 2009, 31:133–137.CrossRefPubMed Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions FAZ had the idea, designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, wrote the manuscript, repeatedly edited it, and approved its final version. MAE helped in the idea, analysis of the data, writing of the manuscript, and approved the final selleck chemical version of the paper.