All patients were required to have a suppressed viral load, defined as a viral load ≤500 copies/mL, at baseline. Patients were excluded if there was no viral load meas-urement in the 6 months after Sunitinib nmr baseline. Virological failure was

defined as a viral load >500 copies/mL measured at least 4 months after baseline. Patient follow-up was measured from baseline to date of virological failure or date of last viral load measurement. Poisson regression analysis was used to identify viral load response prior to baseline associated with virological failure after starting new ARVs. Potential explanatory variables included age, gender, year of starting cART, ARV exposure status at cART initiation (ARV-naïve or ARV-experienced), risk group, ethnicity, region of Europe, baseline

CD4 cell count, CD4 nadir, peak viral load, previous AIDS diagnosis, time on cART, current Selleckchem Y-27632 treatment regimen, number of previous treatment regimens, time spent on cART prior to baseline, number of ARVs to which the patient was previously exposed and the reason reported for starting the new ARV. In addition to the traditional explanatory variables investigated above, variables that summarized the history of viral suppression after cART initiation prior to baseline were investigated. The variables used to summarize the history of viral suppression after cART initiation were as follows. 1 Months to initial suppression (HIV RNA ≤500 copies/mL) after starting cART. Viral suppression was

defined as a measurement of HIV RNA ≤500 copies/mL. Viral rebound was defined as a viral load >500 copies/mL measured after a period of suppression prior to the regimen change. For variable 5, any period of time when the patient was off cART and the first 4 months after starting a new cART regimen were excluded. Thus, only periods during which the patient was on cART and should have been virally suppressed were included. Any variable that was significant at the 10% level in the univariate model was then included in a multivariate model. The sensitivity analysis considered confirmed virological failure after baseline (i.e. two consecutive viral load measurements above 500 copies/mL) and, in the subgroup of patients who had viral load measured using an assay with a lower limit filipin of detection of 50 copies/mL, virological failure after baseline defined as a viral load above 50 copies/mL. Analyses were also repeated taking account of HIV drug resistance at baseline in the subset of patients with resistance data, using genotypic sensitivity scores (GSS) calculated using the rega algorithm, version 7.1 [29]. A total of 1827 patients (67%) were included in the analysis. Table 1 describes the characteristics of the patients included in the analysis. Eight hundred and seventy-eight patients (48%) were treatment naïve at cART initiation.