5 m below m s l This area became a lagoon much later than the mo

5 m below m.s.l. This area became a lagoon much later than the more northern and southern parts, where the sea arrived about 7000 BP ( Canali et al., 2007) and about 6000 cal years BP ( Zecchin et al., 2009), respectively. In correspondence

with reflector (2), the salt marsh facies Lsm reveals the presence of a buried salt marsh (alternatively emerged and Duvelisib mw submerged) overlaid by the mudflat facies Lm (in green in Fig. 2a). At 2.21 m, 1.89 m and 1.5 m below m.s.l., three calibrated 14C ages (Table 1) of peat and vegetal remains samples collected in salt marsh, intertidal and subtidal environments, respectively allowed us to reconstruct the evolution of the salt marsh. There was a salt marsh during the Iron Age going back to 863 BC that still existed in 459 BC (before the first stable settlements in the lagoon islands), being sometimes submerged. The salt marsh had disappeared by 240 AD during Roman Times. Core SG24 intersects a large palaeochannel (CL1, Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). The reflection pattern of the palaeochannel is about 110 m wide and extends vertically from about 2 m to about 6 m under the

bottom. The lowest high-amplitude oblique reflector corresponds to the transition from the laminated channel facies Lcl and the sandy channel facies Lcs that is not penetrated by the high frequency acoustic signal as already observed in Madricardo et al. (2007). The channel infill structure includes oblique clinoforms that are sub-parallel and of high-to-moderate amplitude. They have moderate-to-low continuity, dipping southward in the northern part of the palaeochannel. They correspond to the difference of selleck chemical acoustic impedance between layers of clayey silt and thin sandy layers within the tidal channel facies Lcl. This configuration is the result of the active lateral accretion through point bar migration of a large meander palaeochannel in an area that is now a submerged mudflat. The angle of the clinoforms decreases southwards suggesting

a phase of lower energy and decreased sediment grain-size. A slightly wavy low amplitude horizon at about 3 m below m.s.l. suggests the decrease or even the end of the activity of the channel. The 14C dating of plant remains at 6.56 m below m.s.l. in a highly energetic channel environment indicates Histamine H2 receptor that the channel was already active at 819 BC. Therefore, the channel was active at the same time as the salt marsh before the first human settlements in the lagoon. The 14C dating of a shell at 2.61 m below m.s.l. in a subtidal environment confirms that the channel ceased activity in this site by 365 BC. In the upper part of the profile (for about 2 m beneath the bottom) the acoustic pattern is chaotic. This chaotic upper part corresponds to the sedimentary facies of the mudflat Lm in core SG24 (in green in Fig. 2). The study of the acoustic and sedimentary facies of the palaeochannel CL2 (in profile 2, 3 and 4 and cores SG25, SG27 and SG28 in Fig.

Comments are closed.