Evidence-based guidelines for stroke prevention in AF recommend antithrombotic therapy corresponding to the risk of stroke. In practice, many patients with AF do not receive the appropriate antithrombotic therapy and are left either unprotected or inadequately find more protected against stroke. The purpose of the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD) is to determine the real-life management and outcomes of patients newly diagnosed with non-valvular AF.\n\nMethods/design: GARFIELD is an observational, international registry of newly diagnosed AF patients with at least one additional investigator-defined risk factor for stroke. The aim is to enrol 55,000 patients at more than 1000 centres in 50

countries worldwide. Enrolment will take place in five independent, sequential, prospective cohorts; the RG-7388 cost first cohort includes a retrospective validation cohort. Each cohort will be followed up for 2 years. The UK stands to be a significant contributor to GARFIELD, aiming to enrol 4,582

patients, and reflecting the care environment in which patients with AF are managed. The UK protocol will also focus on better understanding the validity of the two main stroke risk scores (CHADS(2) and CHA(2)DS(2)VAS(C)) and the HAS-BLED bleeding risk score, in the context of a diverse patient population.\n\nDiscussion: The GARFIELD registry will describe how therapeutic strategies, patient care, and clinical outcomes evolve over time. This study will provide UK-specific comprehensive data that will allow a range of evaluations both at a national level and in relation to global data and contribute www.selleckchem.com/products/EX-527.html to a better understanding of AF management in the UK.”
“Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is associated with different histological types of glomerulopathies

(GN), which – although showing the same picture on histology – may have different aetiologies. The defective podocyte is at the centre of pathogenesis of all SRNS; thus, SRNS may be referred to as podocytopathies. This review summarises the state of the art of treatment of SRNS in 2008. The vast majority of published manuscripts have ignored the aetiological and histological heterogeneity of SRNS. Most authors nonselectively attributed their patients of all age groups to idiopathic types of SRNS. This led to the considerable risk of misinterpreting successful or unsuccessful treatment schedules. Sadly, there is a lack of randomised, controlled multicentre trials on SRNS in children. In our own paediatric nephrology unit, with more than 200 children with SRNS, one-quarter of all patients had genetic types of GN, one-quarter had secondary types, and half had idiopathic GN. Almost no patients with the genetic form of SRNS responded to immunosuppression. The effect of treatment of secondary types of SRNS depended on the efficacy of treatment of the underlying disease.