Unfortunately, by restricting the Osteoporosis Strategy coordinators to medium and large volume hospitals with fracture clinics, the program misses about one third of fracture patients in Ontario who are treated in small community hospitals as funding an osteoporosis coordinator is not justifiable CYC202 cost in each small community

hospital. Yet, similar to others [12, 13], we have previously shown that an educational intervention alone was not sufficient to improve practice [14], suggesting the need for a more targeted intervention in smaller communities. There have been a number of recent randomized controlled trials of post-fracture care interventions that have reported positive effects [15–23] with a pooled absolute improvement in osteoporosis treatment rates of 20% over and above usual care [24]. However, in all of these trials the majority of patients were recruited from academic Alvocidib solubility dmso centres or health maintenance organizations with high fracture volumes and access to osteoporosis specialists. The current cluster randomized trial was conducted

to determine if an intervention based on the osteoporosis coordinator role in the focused environment of a high-volume urban fracture clinic can be effective when adapted to smaller community hospitals. We hypothesized that a centralized coordinator who identifies and follows up with fracture patients and their primary care physicians by telephone and mail will increase the proportion of patients who receive appropriate investigation and treatment

for osteoporosis compared with simple fall prevention advice among patients. Methods Study design We conducted a cluster randomized trial in which the hospital emergency department was the unit (cluster) of allocation and men and women with a low trauma fracture were the unit of analysis. Since the purpose of the trial was to change practice behaviour and patients in these communities were likely to have the same primary care physician, a cluster design selleckchem was chosen to minimize contamination. A-1210477 mouse Setting and participants Hospital eligibility criteria and recruitment Hospitals without a dedicated osteoporosis screening coordinator that treated more than 60 fracture patients per year in their Emergency Department (ED) and who were members of the Ontario Telemedicine Network were potentially eligible (n = 54). Information letters were sent to the hospitals explaining the study and site visits were conducted by the centralized coordinator. Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Board of the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and each of the participating sites. Patient eligibility criteria and recruitment Emergency Department records provided through the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System database at each hospital site were used to identify all new cases of fracture.