The results presented in Fig. 3(a) are similar for vaccine coverage between 70% and 95%. The base model predictions are sensitive to assumptions regarding vaccine efficacy and mixing (Fig. http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Vorinostat-saha.html 3(b–d)). At equilibrium, the vaccine efficacy scenarios produce very different numbers of varicella cases following 1-dose vaccination (Fig. 3(b–c)). The predicted reduction in overall varicella cases at equilibrium ranges

from 2% (worst case scenario) to 98% (vaccine efficacy scenario 1). These differences between the vaccine efficacy scenarios are mainly due to large differences in the number of breakthrough cases predicted ( Fig. 3(c)). Fig. 3(e) shows the impact Fulvestrant datasheet of mixing assumptions on the predicted incidence of varicella following vaccination. Interestingly, the WAIFW matrix scenario produced relatively similar post-vaccine incidence than the Base case scenario (which is based on empirical

contact patterns). This result, however, should not be viewed as a validation of our Base case mixing scenario and may be because both mixing scenarios are reproducing the same age-specific force of infection. On the other hand, the England and Wales mixing scenario predicts a much smaller post-honeymoon epidemic and greater vaccine effectiveness against varicella. Vaccine effectiveness is higher under the England and Wales mixing scenario because it assumes very low older adult effective contact rates (low contact rates and force of infection in adults). Thus, it is difficult for varicella infection to be sustained in the adult population (e.g. an adult whose vaccine protection has waned will have a low probability of contacting someone with varicella). Fig. 4 illustrates the predicted impact of 1-dose infant vaccination on mafosfamide zoster. The base model (age-specific boost & 24 years immunity) predicts that cases of zoster will increase in the first 30 years following vaccination. In the long-term, zoster incidence is predicted to decline as the proportion of individuals

with a negative history of VZV increases in the population due to the effectiveness of varicella vaccination. The only mechanism by which zoster incidence could increase in the long-term is if the varicella vaccine virus has a higher reactivation rate than the wild-type. The magnitude of the impact of varicella vaccination on zoster depends on many factors, including: (1) whether or not exposure to VZV boosts zoster immunity (Fig. 4(a)), (2) varicella vaccine efficacy (Fig. 4(b)), and (3) effective mixing patterns (Fig. 4(c)). Firstly, if exposure to VZV does not protect against zoster (No boost) and the vaccine virus does not reactivate, then cases of zoster will decrease slowly over time as the proportion of vaccinated individuals increases (Fig. 4(a)).